Wiki Page Revisions
12 Commits
12 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
f775e451d1
|
NetworkPolicy follow-up (Gitea #5): the gotenberg switch, and three things that were load-bearing and written nowhere
Chart-Style-Guide, gotenberg and keycloak. THE CONVENTION SENTENCE that explains the whole shape of this rollout, and was missing: no chart ships allowedNamespaces pre-filled, ever. A chart naming mc-router or stalwart in its defaults would bake in an assumption about this cluster's namespace layout, which a chart cannot keep true. Restrictive is the default; filling it is the DEPLOYMENT adaptation, made where the namespace layout is visible. So the release-side one-liners this sweep produces are the expected procedure rather than a defect list, and the major on each chart is what announces them. ingressController is the single exception, because it names a cluster component and not a tenant. THE ONE CLUSTER SETTING THIS CONVENTION DEPENDS ON AND CANNOT CHECK: Traefik must not run with hostNetwork. Measured 2026-10-14 - the rke2-traefik DaemonSet has none and its pods carry real pod IPs (10.42.3.120, 10.42.4.94, 10.42.0.187 in the pod CIDR 10.42.0.0/16, while the nodes sit on entirely different addresses), and only because of that does a podSelector match it. On host networking those pods share the node's network namespace, stop being selectable as pods, the ingressController entry matches nothing, and every web chart in the repository goes dark at once - while every policy is still accepted and still reads as correct. The symptom to recognise is exactly that shape: all web traffic stops together and every pod stays Ready, because the probe path does not run through the controller. Same class of dependency as --enable-certificate-owner-ref in #126, and it is recorded both here and in the header of template-chart's policy, so whoever changes the controller's networking meets the consequence on the thing they are changing. AND WHY THE ingressController RULE WORKS AT ALL: a policy applies to traffic that came through a Service. A Service is only destination NAT and the policy is evaluated at the POD's interface, so a ClusterIP exempts nothing. What the Service changes is the SOURCE ADDRESS - pod to ClusterIP to pod preserves it, so a podSelector can still match the Traefik pod; NodePort traffic with the default externalTrafficPolicy: Cluster is masqueraded to a node, which is why those rules cannot be restricted by source and are left open instead. stalwart's template already carried the second half; the first is the one everything rests on. gotenberg gains networkPolicy.egress.remoteAssets, off by default - the maintainer's decision, and it keeps restrictive-by-default intact: a named switch rather than an opening, so the trade is a decision someone made instead of an unplaceable [80, 443] in extraPorts. Its page now carries both measured halves: paperless-ngx sends the .eml to TIKA for parsing and the resulting HTML HERE for rendering, two separate cluster-internal endpoints - so EMBEDDED images are MIME parts inside the file and need no network from either service (which is why apache-tika stays DNS-only), while REMOTE images are fetched by Chromium at render time and are silently dropped with the switch off. The PDF is produced and is simply missing them. Named as unverified, because it was not checked: whether paperless re-embeds what Tika extracted before handing the HTML over. If it does not, embedded images would be lost too - but that would be pre-existing paperless behaviour and not the policy. keycloak's page gets the measurement that makes its blast radius smaller than the page previously implied: every readable in-cluster consumer uses the PUBLIC name (bulwark's OAUTH_ISSUER_URL, homarr's AUTH_OIDC_ISSUER, the paperless releases through their socialaccount block), so their traffic arrives from Traefik and is permitted as shipped. A search for the in-cluster Service name across pod environments and ConfigMaps returned only Keycloak's own pods reaching keycloak-pg-rw.jlab-pg.svc.cluster.local:5432 - which also confirms the egress rule derived from keycloak.db.port is right for the live release. The login test stays the acceptance criterion, and the residual risk is stated rather than dismissed: a consumer whose issuer URL lives in a secret or a realm import is not covered by that search. What changed is that there is now a measured reason to expect the test to pass. |
||
|
|
81980279c4
|
NetworkPolicies in every chart (Gitea #5): the convention, the gate, and what it does not do
29 chart pages plus Chart-Style-Guide, CI-CD, Charts and Lessons-Learned. Chart-Style-Guide gains section 15, and its core is the FOUR PORT CLASSES - the part that is actually hard to get right. A port a network probe addresses stays open until probeSources is set, because the kubelet probes from the worker node's IP and no chart can know it. A NodePort-published port stays open because the source is already masqueraded. Everything else can be and is restricted by source, which is why the charts with a real inbound restriction are exactly those whose probes use a different port. A replica-to-replica bus gets a bare podSelector - and, since policyTypes lists Egress, its outbound side needs a rule of its own or the cluster never forms while every node looks healthy. The exec-probe distinction is written down as load-bearing rather than pedantic: it is the whole reason valkey and minecraft-server are the tightest policies in the repository and every HTTP-probed web app is looser. CI-CD gains the networkpolicy job as section 8 (the later two renumbered), and it ends with the measurement rather than a claim. Two experiments ran on the PR and were reverted: cyberchef's probe port restricted to an address no probe can come from stayed GREEN at 1m9s, and outline with its DNS egress rule removed went RED at 5m59s. Together those say k3s exempts the kubelet's probe traffic while enforcing everything else - so the install-test's net is an EGRESS net, and a wrong ingress port is caught by the render assertion or not at all. Every chart page gets a networkPolicy values table and an operating note naming that chart's own trap, not a boilerplate one: - keycloak carries the blast radius: it is the cluster's identity provider, its http rule is the only source-restricted inbound rule in the repo, and nothing in CI can catch a wrong controller - so the page asks for a real login and a look at consumers' issuer URLs after the first upgrade. - garage asks the reader to check their S3 consumers, because anything in another namespace is blocked until it is in allowedNamespaces. - bulwark names the quietest failure in the sweep: its probes test its own port, so a jmapServerUrl on a blocked port yields a Ready pod serving an empty webmail. - gotenberg explains what its DNS-only cap COSTS - HTML conversion silently loses remote assets - rather than only what it buys. - satisfactory and homeassistant each argue their own Ingress-only policy; satisfactory's deciding half is that it is the one chart with no install-test at all, so an egress cap there would be the only one with no empirical check behind it. - paperless-ngx names the two pods of its release that the object does NOT cover, including the consume CronJob whose pod template carries no labels. - freesailarr explains why ten containers behind a VPN need only three egress rules, and that extraPorts cannot help with an alternative WireGuard port because it is TCP-only. valkey and stalwart are corrected rather than extended. valkey's page now says why having no probeSources is what makes it the tightest policy here and not an incomplete one. stalwart's carries a dated correction: this page and the chart both advised putting the ingress controller's namespace into allowedNamespaces with ["ingress-nginx"] as the example, and both halves are wrong - ingress-nginx is gone from the cluster entirely, and allowedNamespaces would have opened http to every pod in that namespace anyway. Charts drops the claim that valkey is "the first chart with a NetworkPolicy on by default" and says instead that every chart has one, with the two shapes a reader needs before opening any chart page. Lessons-Learned gains four, all transferable: - the net that existed for a different failure than the one it was built for, and why both experiments were needed before either could be read; - a comment that could not describe its own syntax (a template comment must not spell out its own closing delimiter; the render then fails pointing at the template, not at the sentence); - three values that reached no rule and would have read as controls - a convention about value NAMES is not a convention about which values exist; - the subchart whose comments the parent could not fix, and the rule it produced: before making a check a gate, ask which failures the author of this diff can actually fix. |
||
|
|
20d504722e
|
keycloak: one hostname per realm, in both routing modes (#122)
The chart gains keycloak.realmHosts: a list rendering one routing object per entry - an Ingress with app-root, or an HTTPRoute whose Exact match on / carries a RequestRedirect filter to /realms/<realm>/account/. Empty by default, so nothing renders and no installation changes. keycloak: the new Configurable-values row, and the section 'Four more Ingress objects in this namespace, and they are not this chart's' is replaced by 'One hostname per realm' - the four objects are still named there, but now as the thing a migration would adopt rather than as a permanent neighbour. With the per-mode object table, the two required deviations (per-entry tlsSecretName, optional per-entry issuer), the six render aborts and what each prevents, the proxy-buffer loss in Gateway mode phrased for account-console traffic, and the migration order with its one unchecked question. Chart-Style-Guide: the third admissible Ingress shape, with both deviations stated as required rather than tolerated, and keycloak added to the index-naming rule beside homeassistant. CI-CD: 56 assertions over 21 charts becomes 60, keycloak 4 -> 8 plus two 'not checked' lines; and why the overlay does not repeat the entries that the install-test fixture already carries. Charts: the Ingress cell for keycloak. Lessons-Learned: 'The precise message that hid the structural one' - a per-entry check that fired before the mode-conflict abort and answered the wrong diagnosis, plus the note that a strict schema can make a template guard unreachable. |
||
|
|
1c27a6430f
|
keycloak: the Gateway API as an alternative to the two Ingresses (#114)
Two routes in Gateway mode, mirroring the two Ingresses, with httpRoute.admin.parentRefs falling back to httpRoute.parentRefs the way ingress.admin.className falls back to ingress.className - which data path is a property of the Gateway in this API, not of the route. Two things this page did not say before and now does. The admin Ingress did not hang off ingress.enabled: ingress.admin.enabled gated it alone, so ingress.enabled: false still emitted the admin object and clusterIssuer stayed required for it. And the annotations this installation actually depends on - proxy-buffer-size 16k and proxy-buffers-number 4, measured on BOTH live Ingress objects on 2026-10-12 - are set by the operator, not by the chart, and have no counterpart in the Gateway API. Keycloak's large headers make a too-small buffer answer 502 at the proxy while the application logs success, so the section says to set the equivalent at the Gateway before moving DNS. Also recorded: the four keycloak-realm-*-ingress objects in the same namespace belong to jk-cluster-config, share this release's Service rather than its hostname, and keep the host migration unfinished after this chart switches modes. |
||
|
|
1f9ce77762
|
keycloak: the A/B that exonerated the theme mount, and the lesson from it | ||
|
|
5480fac342
|
keycloak: the full restart series, and what it does not say | ||
|
|
40e999980f
|
keycloak: the third install-test run disproves the load explanation | ||
|
|
5e5b726dce
|
keycloak: the install-test timing is an observation, not an invariant | ||
|
|
eed0689a43
|
keycloak: extraVolumes/extraVolumeMounts, the theme route and its trap (Gitea #88) | ||
|
|
cb70372dd8
|
keycloak: group 1000, not the image's root group
Checked rather than suppressed after Trivy's AVD-KSV-0116 on the first run: 521 of 522 entries in the image layer are owned by 1000:0 and every mode grants the owner full access, so uid 1000 needs no group membership to read or execute anything. Group 0 is upstream's OpenShift arbitrary-uid pattern and buys nothing once the owning uid is pinned - and leaving it out keeps a root GID out of the pod without a chart-wide suppression that would also have covered the serving container. |
||
|
|
c983ae10cd
|
keycloak: the readiness check that is gated behind the metrics option
Found while verifying the CI result rather than from the plan, and it changes a default: Keycloak's DATABASE health check is the one row of upstream's check table whose "Requires Metrics" column says yes. With metrics-enabled=false - the chart's default in its first draft - /health/ready answers 200 with the database gone, and the pod keeps taking logins it cannot serve. That is the urlaubsverwaltung shape a second time, and the generalisation is worth more than the fix: the dependency was not missing from a health GROUP this time, it was conditional on an option named for observability, which is a place nobody looks when reviewing a probe. So the rule grows past health groups - find the list of checks the endpoint performs, and find out what each one is conditional on. "This path includes the database" is a claim about configuration, not about the path. keycloak.md: metrics default is now true with that reasoning, a new trap section for it, and the measured install-test figure (71.8s from helm install to both pods Ready, 0 restarts, Gitea PR #87). Also corrected an overclaim of my own in the same page: two replicas both reaching Ready does NOT prove that jdbc-ping found the peer. Readiness reports one node's own health, so two nodes that never met are both Ready and both alone. The install-test rules out the louder half (a replica that cannot start or cannot share the database); the Infinispan view still has to be read out of the log, which is what step 2 of the first-install checklist is for. |
||
|
|
0852b72ee2
|
keycloak: new chart page, index, sidebar, and three rules it bought
The chart page carries the values table, the vault fields, the first-install checklist with the permanent administrator as a mandatory step, the minor-upgrade procedure, and the traps - of which two are the point of the page: hostname-admin is not an access control, and a shared database merges two clusters. Chart index counter: 30 directories / 29 installable. That follows the index TABLE, which already lists convertx - its page landed before its PR, and convertx/ does not exist on origin/main yet. So the number is one ahead of the repository on purpose, as it was before this change. Renovate: the counter-case to garage, measured rather than assumed - four tag shapes on quay.io/keycloak/keycloak and plain docker versioning already excludes the three unwanted ones, so that block carries no versioningTemplate. Written down because an unnecessary constraint is not free: it reads as load-bearing to the next person and has to stay correct as upstream's tagging changes. Plus a section on the automerge decision: switching it off for minor and major was proposed and declined, so the upgrade procedure is documented instead of prevented, with the obligation that puts on whoever reviews an app-version PR. Chart style guide section 11: a chart defaulting to more than one replica ships a PodDisruptionBudget, and it is rendered only while the computed replica count is >= 2 - minAvailable 1 with a single replica blocks every drain forever with a message that names the PDB rather than the replica count. CI/CD: the trusted-registry list for AVD-KSV-0125 is a separate file from the ignore file on purpose, so a new registry is an entry there rather than a suppression. quay.io joined it with this chart. Lessons learned, two entries and three lines in the recurring shape: - "The application that rewrites its own installation at start" - three correct requirements that cannot start a pod together, and why the obvious repair (an empty volume over the directory) breaks the command meant to fill it. - "The upgrade procedure the automerge did not know about" - the general form, which applies to any clustered application whose versions must not be mixed: a constraint living in documentation is invisible to the machinery that performs upgrades, and the better the pipeline, the less likely anybody is standing in the path to notice. |