Files
helm-charts/teamspeak-server/templates/teamspeak-server.networkpolicy.yaml
T
jklein bc580ee291 feat(teamspeak-server): networkPolicy.ingress.ambientMesh
Gitea #143. Additive, default false, so the render is byte-identical to the
previous release - proven by diffing both renders against origin/main rather
than asserted.

Switched on it adds 15008/TCP, ztunnel's HBONE tunnel, to the rule carrying
the probe port, and - inside that rule's source-restricted branch -
169.254.7.127/32, the address the kubelet's probes arrive from once the pod is
in the mesh. Ambient does not bypass NetworkPolicy enforcement, so without the
port a pod whose namespace has joined the mesh is unreachable.

The two halves are one value because the second is the one nobody thinks of:
15008 added by hand leaves a policy that passes review and drops every probe
the first time probeSources is narrowed, and a pod that never becomes Ready
reads as a broken application rather than as a policy.

Minor, not major: additive value, unchanged default, unchanged render.

Port half only: this chart offers no networkPolicy.probeSources - its probes
put no packet on the network - so there is no redirected probe to allow and an
ipBlock for one would match nothing while making the rule look like it did
something. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh ties that exemption to the absence of
probeSources, not to a chart name.
2026-10-19 17:56:57 +00:00

200 lines
9.2 KiB
YAML

{{- /*
NetworkPolicy for teamspeak-server (Gitea #5).
Three ports, two of them NodePorts facing the internet and one that is purely
internal - so this chart shows the public/internal split without the probe
problem getting in the way of either.
voice (UDP) NodePort, open. The clients are on the internet.
fileTransfer (TCP) NodePort, open, and also the port all three probes open
a socket against - justified twice.
web query (10080) NO Service at all, no probe, so it is RESTRICTED to this
namespace plus allowedNamespaces. That is the rule worth
having here: the query interface is administrative.
NOTE THE PORT NUMBERS. This chart happens to use the SAME number for the pod
port and the NodePort (server.voicePort, server.fileTransferPort are both), so
the usual NodePort mistake is invisible here - the number is right either way.
That is a coincidence of this chart's values and not a rule; do not copy the
pattern to a chart where the two differ.
WHAT THIS OBJECT IS: a ceiling on reachability, not an authentication layer.
Only the ports declared below are reachable at all - whatever else the process
binds, now or after the next app update, is blocked without anyone having to
notice it exists.
WHAT IT IS NOT:
- EGRESS IS COARSE. A NetworkPolicy matches CIDRs and selectors and NEVER
hostnames, so "only to the database host" cannot be expressed at all. This
cluster's CNI is Canal (Flannel plus Calico for policy) and has no FQDN
rule; Calico's GlobalNetworkSet could express one but would bind this chart
to Calico, the same argument that kept implementation-specific objects out
of the Gateway-API sweep (#114). Each egress rule therefore permits its
PORT to any destination.
- NOT A BOUNDARY WHERE THE CNI DOES NOT ENFORCE ONE. An unenforced policy is
accepted by the API server and filters nothing, so everything reads as
configured while nothing is filtered.
- THE REASONING IS IN TEMPLATE COMMENTS, not in "#" comments: those are part
of the rendered object, travel into the cluster and appear in every release
diff. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh fails on a rendered "#".
THE PORT NUMBERS BELOW ARE POD PORTS, NEVER NODEPORTS. A NetworkPolicy is
evaluated at the pod's network interface, after kube-proxy has already
translated a NodePort to the targetPort, so a NodePort number here would match
nothing while looking strict - and, being the only rule for that port, would
block every inbound connection instead. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh asserts
every port here against the containerPorts of the pod spec this policy
selects.
*/ -}}
{{- if .Values.networkPolicy.enabled }}
{{- $np := .Values.networkPolicy }}
{{- $ns := .Release.Namespace }}
{{- $allowedNs := $np.allowedNamespaces | default list }}
{{- /* networkPolicy.ingress - the policy's INBOUND side, and not the same
thing as the top-level .Values.ingress (the Ingress object) - both match
a search for "ingress". */}}
{{- $npIngress := $np.ingress | default dict }}
{{- $ambientMesh := $npIngress.ambientMesh }}
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-networkpolicy
labels:
app: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-networkpolicy
spec:
{{- /*
Selects the StatefulSet's pods. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh fails if
this matches no pod spec of the same render - which is the mistake that
would otherwise leave a policy in the namespace filtering nothing, and
its usual cause is a label renamed in the workload template.
*/}}
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-sfs
policyTypes:
- Ingress
{{- /*
Egress is listed because a voice server's outbound needs are small: DNS and
HTTPS. The uncertainty is named in the rule itself rather than hidden - see the
note on TeamSpeak's accounting ports.
*/}}
- Egress
ingress:
{{- /*
THE VOICE PORT, UDP, published as a NodePort and deliberately open: the clients
are on the internet, and after masquerading the source address is a cluster
node anyway.
PROTOCOL MATTERS AS MUCH AS THE NUMBER HERE. Voice is UDP, and a rule written
for TCP on the same number would be accepted, would look complete, and would
drop every voice packet - which is why ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh checks the
protocol against the containerPort's and not just the number.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: UDP
port: {{ .Values.server.voicePort | int64 }}
{{- /*
THE FILE-TRANSFER PORT, TCP, also a NodePort and also open. It is additionally
the port all three probes open a TCP socket against, so it is the probe path as
well - open for two independent reasons.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: {{ .Values.server.fileTransferPort | int64 }}
{{- if $ambientMesh }}
{{- /* networkPolicy.ingress.ambientMesh (Gitea #143). 15008/TCP is ztunnel's
HBONE tunnel, the port every inbound connection arrives on once the
namespace carries istio.io/dataplane-mode - ambient "does not and will
never bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy enforcement", so without it a pod
in the mesh is unreachable.
It is the one port here that is NOT a containerPort of the selected pod
spec: ztunnel terminates it, not the application. ci/run-networkpolicy-
test.sh holds a NAMED exception for exactly this number, gated on exactly
this value, and proves on a second render that it stays the only such
port and that it is absent while the value is false.
THE PORT HALF ONLY, and that is not an omission. Elsewhere this switch
also adds 169.254.7.127/32 as a probe source, because inside the mesh the
kubelet's probes are redirected away from the worker node's address.
This chart offers no networkPolicy.probeSources at all, so the rule
carrying the probe port is never restricted by source - and an
unrestricted rule needs no probe address. Measured in the render: three
tcpSocket probes, so these ARE network probes - they are simply never
restricted here.
WHICH RULE IT JOINS:
the file-transfer rule, the policy's open TCP rule. The voice rule is
UDP and the rule on 10080 is restricted to the namespace. A policy is an
OR over its rules, so which rule carries the port decides only which
sources reach it - and an open TCP rule is the honest default while it
is unknown where ztunnel dials from.
NOT MEASURED: that 15008 alone suffices comes from Istio's
documentation. Measured on this cluster is only which listeners ztunnel
opens. Provable at the first namespace to join the mesh; none has. */}}
- protocol: TCP
port: 15008
{{- end }}
{{- /*
THE WEB QUERY INTERFACE, and the one rule in this chart with real security
value. It has no Service and no probe, so it can be restricted, and it is: this
namespace plus allowedNamespaces. The query interface is administrative, and
before this object the only thing keeping it off the network was that nothing
published it.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 10080
from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
{{- /*
Set by Kubernetes itself on every namespace (>= 1.21), so this needs no
labelling work on a namespace this chart does not own.
*/}}
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: {{ $ns }}
{{- range $allowedNs }}
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: {{ . | quote }}
{{- end }}
egress:
{{- /*
DNS, unconditionally. There is no value to switch this off, and that is
deliberate: a knob whose only other setting breaks every name lookup in
the pod is a trap and not a feature.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: UDP
port: 53
- protocol: TCP
port: 53
{{- /*
Outbound HTTPS, for the server's own update and accounting calls. To any
destination - hostnames cannot appear here.
IF THE SERVER REFUSES TO START AFTER THIS POLICY ARRIVES, THIS IS THE RULE TO
WIDEN: TeamSpeak's accounting service has historically used ports of its own
(TCP 2008, UDP 2010 on the 3.x line), and this chart cannot know what the 6.x
beta does. The install-test covers this chart, so a startup that depends on a
blocked port shows up there rather than in production - but a license or
accounting check that merely degrades would not.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 443
{{- with $np.egress }}
{{- with .extraPorts }}
{{- /*
Ports only, to any destination - see the header. This is the operator's
escape hatch from the egress cap, and the only alternative to switching
the whole policy off.
*/}}
- ports:
{{- range . }}
- protocol: TCP
port: {{ int . }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}