Files
helm-charts/matrix-synapse
jklein e54cfe5fdd feat(matrix-synapse): Gateway-API as an alternative to the Ingress
Group 3 of the #114 sweep. TWO HTTPRoutes - and the shape is not the one the
issue described.

#114 says this chart renders its Ingresses in a LOOP OVER SEVERAL APPS. It
does not; that is freesailarr. It renders ONE Ingress object with TWO HOST
rules: the homeserver on ingress.domain at "/", and the delegation nginx on
matrix.delegation.serverUrl at "/.well-known/matrix". An HTTPRoute's
spec.hostnames applies to the WHOLE object, so two hostnames that want
different paths and different backends have to be two objects. That is the
only faithful translation, not a stylistic choice.

httpRoute.delegation.hostnames deliberately does NOT fall back to
httpRoute.hostnames. The server name is what REMOTE homeservers resolve and is
a different thing from the homeserver's own hostname; the migration order -
homeserver host first, server name last - depends on telling them apart, and a
chart-global hostname list covering both would erase the distinction.
httpRoute.delegation.parentRefs falls back to httpRoute.parentRefs, which
matters because the server name is usually an apex domain behind a different
Gateway.

ONE THING THIS MODE IMPROVES, and it is the awkward part of Matrix delegation.
Under ingress-nginx two Ingress objects cannot both claim one hostname - the
admission webhook rejects the second - which is why the delegation rule has to
live inside this chart's single Ingress object even though the apex domain
usually belongs to a website. HTTPRoutes attached to the same listener for the
same hostname are merged by the implementation, longest match winning, so the
/.well-known/matrix route can sit beside whatever owns that apex.

WHAT THIS MODE DROPS, MEASURED ON THE LIVE OBJECT ON 2026-10-12 - and ONE OF
THE TWO IS NOT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The live Ingress carried, all of it
operator-supplied through ingress.annotations (this chart sets none of it):

    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-body-size:    50m
    nginx.org/client-max-body-size:                 50m
    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/configuration-snippet: |
      more_set_headers "X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr";
      more_set_headers "X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme";
      more_set_headers "Host $host:$server_port";

1. THE BODY SIZE IS THE REAL LOSS. Synapse's media repository takes uploads;
   its own ceiling is max_upload_size in homeserver.yaml, which this chart
   cannot see because the whole config arrives from 1Password. The effective
   limit is the smaller of the two, and in this mode the proxy half becomes
   the GATEWAY'S default - neither number anyone can point at is necessarily
   the one that decides. No counterpart in the Gateway API, so per decision 2
   of #114 it is documented, not rebuilt. nginx.org/client-max-body-size is
   the same limit spelled for NGINX Inc's controller, a hedge across both
   implementations, and it goes for the same reason. (#114's own measured
   table did not list matrix-synapse under proxy-body-size at all; the live
   object has it.)

2. THE SNIPPET IS NOT LOAD-BEARING, which took checking rather than assuming.
   It looks like what Synapse's x_forwarded setting depends on - client IP for
   rate limiting, and federation. It is not: more_set_headers is the
   headers-more module's OUTPUT-header directive ("Replaces (if any) or adds
   (if not any) the specified output headers"), the request-side directive
   being more_set_input_headers. So those three headers are added to the
   RESPONSE TO THE CLIENT; Synapse never sees them, and what it reads with
   x_forwarded: true is the REQUEST's X-Forwarded-For, which ingress-nginx
   supplies itself. The Gateway API's ResponseHeaderModifier could not rebuild
   it anyway (it knows no nginx variables), and should not: NOTES.txt says in
   as many words not to re-create it and not to read its absence as the cause
   of a rate-limiting or federation problem.

   Stated as what it is - a reading of the directive's documented semantics.
   Nothing here observed a Synapse instance with and without the snippet.

NOTES.txt now asks $published (ingress.enabled OR httpRoute.enabled) wherever
it used to ask ingress.enabled - the server-name/serverUrl mismatch warning,
the "clients work fine" aside and the scaled-to-zero paragraph were all really
asking whether anything publishes the release.

Minor: additive, defaults unchanged. Empty helm template diff against
origin/main with ci/matrix-synapse/test-values.yaml.

Part of #114
2026-10-13 08:59:09 +00:00
..