3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
jklein	9625d8b182	feat(bulwark): Gateway-API as an alternative to the Ingress ... Group 3 of the #114 sweep. One route, one rule, at the root - and THREE EXPECTATIONS ABOUT THIS CHART DID NOT SURVIVE CONTACT WITH IT: - #114 says bulwark has TWO Ingress objects. It has ONE. keycloak has two. - #114's measured table lists bulwark under rewrite-target. It has no rewrite-target annotation and CANNOT have one: NEXT_PUBLIC_BASE_PATH is compiled into the bundle, so the application cannot be served under a sub-path, and stripping a prefix at the proxy would yield a page that loads and then fetches everything from the wrong place. Every occurrence of the string "rewrite-target" in this chart - values.yaml, the schema, the Ingress template - is an explanation of exactly that. A grep for the string finds the refutations and counts them as occurrences. - ci/run-httproute-match-test.sh said in its header that bulwark was the second rewrite-target chart and would meet the #118 prefix/redirect assurance when group 3 landed. Group 3 landed and it does not: with no URLRewrite on a prefix other than "/", the assurance's precondition is never met here. The header is corrected rather than left standing, and it now says freesailarr is the only chart the pairing applies to. So no redirect rule is added, and none is needed. WHAT THIS MODE DROPS, MEASURED ON THE LIVE OBJECT rather than inferred. On 2026-10-12 the live Ingress on webmail.bekemeyer-klein.de carried nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/proxy-body-size: 25m supplied by the OPERATOR through ingress.annotations - values.yaml recommends exactly that value and explains why the chart cannot pick it, so the chart sets nothing and a reader of this repository alone would not find it. It is the single annotation this installation depends on, and the Gateway API has no body-size counterpart: implementation policy, not routing. Per decisions 1 and 2 of #114 it is NAMED, not rebuilt - in values.yaml, in the schema and in the Gateway branch of NOTES.txt, in this application's own terms: an attachment above the Gateway's default is rejected before Bulwark sees a byte, the 413 comes from the proxy, and it arrives after the user has written the mail and attached the file. CORRECTED CLAIM, the same one garage and calibre-web-automated needed: the Ingress template, the bulwark.publicUrl helper and the schema all stated that nothing outside the Ingress template FUNCTIONALLY reads ingress.domain. The HTTPRoute reads it, so the claim held only while both modes were off. All three now say so, and the route carries a required() of its own. bulwark.publicUrl follows the ACTIVE mode instead of always printing ingress.domain. The two differ exactly when httpRoute.hostnames is set, which is how a migration off the Ingress runs - and printing the old host there would hand the operator an OIDC redirect URI for the hostname being migrated away from, a failure that surfaces as a rejected login at the identity provider and says nothing about this chart. Minor: additive, defaults unchanged. Empty helm template diff against origin/main with ci/bulwark/test-values.yaml. Part of #114	2026-10-13 08:59:09 +00:00
jklein	f202fdc3fc	fix(freesailarr): redirect the bare /qbittorrent prefix in Gateway mode ... qBittorrent has no base-path setting, so the chart serves it under a prefix and strips that prefix before the request reaches it. For the slashed form that is correct. For the BARE form - /qbittorrent, no trailing slash - the request is rewritten to "/" and qBittorrent answers 200 with its login page, while the browser's document URL keeps the prefixless form. Every relative link in that page therefore resolves against the host root, and on the shared host the root is seerr: the login form comes up unstyled and does nothing while a different application answers its assets and XHRs. Nothing reports an error at any level. The shared-domain HTTPRoute now carries a second rule for qBittorrent: an Exact match on qbittorrent.ingress.path with a RequestRedirect filter that replaces the full path with the slashed form, statusCode 301. The Gateway API ranks an Exact path match above every prefix match, so it wins over both qBittorrent's own PathPrefix rule and seerr's "/" wherever it is emitted - the rules' length-descending order stays a rendering convention. 301 rather than 308 because only 301 and 302 are Core in that API; an Extended value an implementation declines makes it set Accepted=False on the WHOLE route, which would take the four neighbouring apps' routing down with it, and that would also contradict decision 1 of Gitea #114. statusCode is written out because it defaults to 302. The rule is guarded on the app being qbittorrent and its path not being "/", and it reads the path from the value, never a literal. The INGRESS BRANCH IS UNCHANGED, deliberately. The remedy there is an nginx configuration-snippet annotation, and the chart cannot ship it: snippets are ignored unless the controller runs with allow-snippet-annotations=true, off by default since ingress-nginx 1.9 and only switched on by accepting annotation risk level "Critical". A shipped annotation would be a silent no-op on every cluster keeping the default. The working snippet, that price, and why a third Ingress object with pathType: Exact is not a substitute - buildLocation in ingress-nginx controller-v1.14.5 returns a regex location in its enforceRegex branch before reaching the PathTypeExact branch, and enforceRegex is computed once per nginx server over every location of the hostname, one of which carries rewrite-target - are all written out in values.yaml instead. ci/run-httproute-match-test.sh gains a third assertion, per HTTPRoute object: a rule stripping a prefix with ReplacePrefixMatch requires a rule in the same route matching that path Exactly and carrying a RequestRedirect filter. This is what stops the gap reappearing; bulwark is the second rewrite-target chart and meets the same check when group 3 of Gitea #114 lands. 37 assertions over 15 charts, up from 36. Both fail paths were exercised: the rule deleted, and the redirect pointed at a path other than the one stripped. Minor and not major: with the Ingress branch untouched and httpRoute.enabled defaulting to false, no existing release's render changes by a byte and no value becomes required. Shown by an empty helm template diff against origin/main in both Ingress shapes, shared-domain and per-app hosts. Fixes #118	2026-10-12 20:06:09 +00:00
jklein	50f683776e	feat(cyberchef): Gateway-API as an alternative to the Ingress (pilot) ... The Gateway-API pilot of Gitea #114: one chart, the convention, the CI that holds it. The remaining 20 charts follow in their own PRs. The form, additive and off by default: httpRoute: enabled: false # counterpart to ingress.enabled parentRefs: [] # the Gateway - a platform object hostnames: [] # empty = [ingress.domain] Only HTTPRoute with parentRefs is rendered: no Gateway, no gatewayClassName, no Certificate, and no implementation-specific policy object. That subset is identical on nginx-gateway-fabric, Cilium, Envoy Gateway and Istio, which is what lets the implementation be chosen later without touching the charts again. Class and certificate move to the platform. Four guards, all against silent failures: - mutually exclusive with ingress.enabled, with a render abort naming BOTH value paths. A migration runs over a second hostname, not in parallel. - parentRefs mandatory in Gateway mode, render abort on the empty list: a route without a parent is created, is schema-valid, and routes nothing. - hostnames empty means [ingress.domain], so the hostname has one source. - the mode is a VALUE, not auto-detection: .Capabilities.APIVersions is unreliable at template time and a missing CRD fails at install time. ingress.clusterIssuer was already only read inside the Ingress template, so the "conditionally required" half of #114 needed no change in this chart - checked rather than assumed, and it has to be re-checked per chart in the sweep. CI, both halves, because neither covers the other: - the install-test installs cyberchef in GATEWAY mode against the REAL Gateway-API CRDs (standard channel v1.6.3, pinned and Renovate-tracked, applied --server-side). A schema-less stub would accept a malformed route and prove only that something was created. The Ingress path of this one chart is no longer installed; it is a built-in type that never routed in k3d anyway, and helm lint renders this chart's defaults - Ingress mode - on every PR. - ci/run-httproute-match-test.sh, over every chart on every PR: every backendRefs entry must name a Service, on a port, that the SAME render creates, and parentRefs must not be empty. The CRDs accept both of those mistakes, so the schema cannot catch them, and the only report would be a route status no controller writes in CI. What stays unprovable, and is written down instead of implied: that traffic flows. No Gateway controller runs in k3d. Minor: additive with unchanged defaults, proven by an empty helm template diff against origin/main for the default values. Part of #114	2026-10-12 15:16:26 +00:00