sure: new chart for the we-promise Sure app (1.0.0+up0.7.4)
One StatefulSet with two containers - the Puma web process and a Sidekiq worker - sharing one ReadWriteOnce PVC at /rails/storage. That shared volume is the reason they live in one pod: splitting them would need an RWX volume. Only the web container migrates, because the image entrypoint runs db:prepare solely for the './bin/rails server' command; the worker is started through args: so the entrypoint (and its jemalloc preload) stays in place and the two can never race. Probes are chosen for what they prove: liveness and startup use Rails' /up, which is a boot check and touches no database, while readiness uses '/', which runs User.count through authenticate_user! in self-hosted mode and therefore fails while Postgres is unreachable. The worker speaks no HTTP, so all three of its probes ask sidekiqmon whether this pod still holds a Sidekiq heartbeat in Redis. Three OnePasswordItem CRs (app, database, redis), ingress.domain kept required outside the Ingress because APP_DOMAIN and the WebAuthn relying party read it, strict values.schema.json, CI fixtures with throwaway Postgres 16 and Redis, and a Renovate manager on semver so the -alpha/-rc/-hotfix channel and the moving tags are never selected.
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
819d7b2cf7
commit
93fdb3eaea
21 files changed
+1565
-3
No files matched your search
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
apiVersion: v2
|
||||
name: sure
|
||||
description: A Helm chart to deploy Sure (we-promise) on Kubernetes
|
||||
icon: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/we-promise/sure/main/public/android-chrome-512x512.png
|
||||
|
||||
type: application
|
||||
|
||||
version: 1.0.0+up0.7.4
|
||||
appVersion: "0.7.4"
|
||||
|
||||
maintainers:
|
||||
- name: jklein
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user