feat(outline)!: NetworkPolicy, on by default

Major, as every chart in this rollout is.

Inbound 3000 only; outbound DNS plus 5432, 6379 and 443. Those three egress
ports are the STANDARD ones and not the configured ones, which is this chart's
real limitation and is written into values.yaml, the template header and
NOTES.txt rather than left to be discovered: Outline's database, Redis and OIDC
provider all arrive as connection URLs inside 1Password items that the chart
never parses, so it cannot know where they listen and cannot validate a guess.
A dependency on another port is blocked, and because all three probes hit
/_health - which checks Postgres and Redis - the symptom is a pod that never
becomes Ready rather than an error anyone reads. networkPolicy.egress.extraPorts
is the escape hatch.

That same property is what makes this chart the right place for the enforcement
experiment in the next commit.

Also reverts the cyberchef fixture from the first experiment: with the probe
port restricted to an address that is not the node's, the install-test went
GREEN, so the claim that it catches a blocked probe path does not hold as
written. The next commit establishes whether policies are enforced in CI at
all.

Part of #5
This commit is contained in:
jklein committed 2026-10-14 14:07:06 +00:00
1 parent d3ef3729f8
commit 77b978d669
6 files changed
+385 -25

No files matched your search

+54
View File
@@ -235,3 +235,57 @@ FORCE_HTTPS IS ON
header. Turned on, Outline redirects to https itself — which loops
endlessly if that header does not reach the pod.
{{- end }}
{{- if .Values.networkPolicy.enabled }}
NETWORKPOLICY IS ACTIVE — WHAT IT CAPS, AND WHAT IT DOES NOT
{{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-networkpolicy selects this workload's pods.
Inbound: TCP 3000 only. Outbound: DNS, TCP 5432 (Postgres), 6379 (Redis),
443 (OIDC discovery){{ with .Values.networkPolicy.egress }}{{ with .extraPorts }}, plus TCP {{ join ", " . }}{{ end }}{{ end }}.
THOSE EGRESS PORTS ARE THE STANDARD ONES, NOT YOUR CONFIGURED ONES. The
database, Redis and OIDC URLs all live inside 1Password items that this chart
never parses, so it cannot know where your dependencies listen. A dependency
on another port is blocked — and since all three probes hit /_health, which
checks Postgres and Redis, the symptom is a pod that never becomes Ready
rather than a connection error anyone sees. Add the real port to
networkPolicy.egress.extraPorts.
Three limits belong in the same breath, because none of them is visible in
the object itself:
- EGRESS IS BY PORT, NEVER BY DESTINATION. A NetworkPolicy matches CIDRs and
selectors and cannot express a hostname, so every egress rule permits its
port to ANY address. That is a limit of the object, not a shortcut — this
cluster's CNI (Canal: Flannel plus Calico) has no FQDN rule either. An
outbound port the chart does not know about is BLOCKED: add it to
networkPolicy.egress.extraPorts, and expect to find out through an
application-level connection error rather than through this object.
{{- if .Values.networkPolicy.probeSources }}
- THE PROBE PATH IS RESTRICTED in this release, because
networkPolicy.probeSources is set to
{{ join ", " .Values.networkPolicy.probeSources }}
Probes come from the IP of the WORKER NODE running the pod. If none of those
CIDRs covers the node this pod lands on, the kubelet's probes are dropped
and THE POD NEVER BECOMES READY — the rollout then times out and the symptom
looks like a broken application. Compare
kubectl -n {{ .Release.Namespace }} describe pod -l app={{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-sfs
against `kubectl get node -o wide`.
{{- else }}
- THE PROBED PORT IS OPEN INSIDE THE CLUSTER. networkPolicy.probeSources is
empty, so that rule carries no source selector at all and any pod the CNI
routes to can reach it. Not from the internet — but this is NOT pod-level
isolation. Narrowing it means listing the worker node IPs in
networkPolicy.probeSources, because the kubelet probes from the node's own
address and the chart cannot know it; a wrong guess there leaves the pod
permanently un-Ready.
{{- end }}
- IT IS ONLY A BOUNDARY WHERE THE CNI ENFORCES POLICIES. Where it does not,
this object is accepted and filters nothing, so everything reads as
configured while nothing is filtered. `kubectl -n {{ .Release.Namespace }} get networkpolicy`
shows the object exists; only a connection attempt from an unrelated
namespace shows that it bites.
Switch it off with networkPolicy.enabled: false.
{{- end }}
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
{{- /*
NetworkPolicy for outline (Gitea #5).
Outline is the first chart of this rollout whose policy has real work to do in
BOTH directions, and it is also the one that proves the egress cap bites: all
three of its probes hit /_health, which checks Postgres AND Redis, so a pod
that cannot reach its data stores never becomes Ready.
THE EGRESS PORTS ARE THE CHART'S ONLY KNOWLEDGE OF ITS DEPENDENCIES, AND THEY
ARE A GUESS AT THE STANDARD ONES. Outline's database, Redis and OIDC provider
are configured through connection URLs inside 1Password items - the chart never
sees a host or a port, cannot derive one, and cannot validate one. So the rules
below name the standard ports (5432, 6379, 443) and nothing else. A deployment
whose Postgres listens anywhere else is BLOCKED, and it finds out through an
application-level connection error, not through this object. That is the
upgrade risk of this chart's policy, stated plainly; the escape hatch is
networkPolicy.egress.extraPorts.
WHAT THIS OBJECT IS: a ceiling on reachability, not an authentication layer.
Only the ports declared below are reachable at all - whatever else the process
binds, now or after the next app update, is blocked without anyone having to
notice it exists.
WHAT IT IS NOT:
- EGRESS IS COARSE. A NetworkPolicy matches CIDRs and selectors and NEVER
hostnames, so "only to the database host" cannot be expressed at all. This
cluster's CNI is Canal (Flannel plus Calico for policy) and has no FQDN
rule; Calico's GlobalNetworkSet could express one but would bind this chart
to Calico, the same argument that kept implementation-specific objects out
of the Gateway-API sweep (#114). Each egress rule therefore permits its
PORT to any destination.
- NOT A BOUNDARY WHERE THE CNI DOES NOT ENFORCE ONE. An unenforced policy is
accepted by the API server and filters nothing, so everything reads as
configured while nothing is filtered.
- THE REASONING IS IN TEMPLATE COMMENTS, not in "#" comments: those are part
of the rendered object, travel into the cluster and appear in every release
diff. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh fails on a rendered "#".
THE PORT NUMBERS BELOW ARE POD PORTS, NEVER NODEPORTS. A NetworkPolicy is
evaluated at the pod's network interface, after kube-proxy has already
translated a NodePort to the targetPort, so a NodePort number here would match
nothing while looking strict - and, being the only rule for that port, would
block every inbound connection instead. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh asserts
every port here against the containerPorts of the pod spec this policy
selects.
*/ -}}
{{- if .Values.networkPolicy.enabled }}
{{- $np := .Values.networkPolicy }}
{{- $ns := .Release.Namespace }}
{{- $probeSources := $np.probeSources | default list }}
{{- $allowedNs := $np.allowedNamespaces | default list }}
{{- $ic := $np.ingressController | default dict }}
{{- $routed := or .Values.ingress.enabled .Values.httpRoute.enabled }}
apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: NetworkPolicy
metadata:
name: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-networkpolicy
labels:
app: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-networkpolicy
spec:
{{- /*
Selects the StatefulSet's pods. ci/run-networkpolicy-test.sh fails if
this matches no pod spec of the same render - which is the mistake that
would otherwise leave a policy in the namespace filtering nothing, and
its usual cause is a label renamed in the workload template.
*/}}
podSelector:
matchLabels:
app: {{ .Release.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Name }}-sfs
policyTypes:
- Ingress
{{- /*
Egress is listed because there IS something to restrict: this workload
needs DNS and the ports named below, and nothing else. A chart whose
workload opens no outbound connection of its own must NOT list Egress -
valkey is the example - because a rule that constrains nothing makes the
object look stricter than it is.
*/}}
- Egress
ingress:
{{- /*
3000 - the only port this pod declares, the one the Service targets, and the
one all three probes address (/_health). It is therefore the probe path.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 3000
{{- if $probeSources }}
{{- /*
RESTRICTED, because the operator supplied probeSources. The kubelet's probes
come from the IP of the WORKER NODE running the pod, so that address has to be
in the list or the pod never becomes Ready - and a pod that is never Ready
reads as a broken application rather than as a policy.
The ingress controller is added to the same rule, or the Ingress goes dark the
moment this list is filled.
*/}}
from:
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
{{- /*
Set by Kubernetes itself on every namespace (>= 1.21), so this needs no
labelling work on a namespace this chart does not own.
*/}}
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: {{ $ns }}
{{- if and $routed $ic.namespace }}
{{- /*
ONE from-entry with TWO selectors, which is an AND: pods carrying these labels
IN that namespace. Written as two list entries it would be an OR, and would
open the port to every pod in kube-system.
*/}}
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: {{ $ic.namespace | quote }}
{{- with $ic.podLabels }}
podSelector:
matchLabels:
{{- toYaml . | nindent 14 }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- range $allowedNs }}
- namespaceSelector:
matchLabels:
kubernetes.io/metadata.name: {{ . | quote }}
{{- end }}
{{- range $probeSources }}
- ipBlock:
cidr: {{ . | quote }}
{{- end }}
{{- else }}
{{- /*
NO "from" SELECTOR, WHICH MEANS OPEN - deliberately, and only inside the
cluster, because this port carries no NodePort. The alternative was to guess
the worker node CIDRs, and a wrong guess blocks every kubelet probe: the pod
stays un-Ready, the rollout times out, and the cause looks like the
application. An empty "from: []" would be worse than either - it allows
everything too, but while reading as a restriction. Narrow it with
networkPolicy.probeSources.
*/}}
{{- end }}
egress:
{{- /*
DNS, unconditionally. There is no value to switch this off, and that is
deliberate: a knob whose only other setting breaks every name lookup in
the pod is a trap and not a feature.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: UDP
port: 53
- protocol: TCP
port: 53
{{- /*
Postgres. The port, not the host - outline.secrets.dbSecretRef carries a
connection URL the chart never parses, so this is the STANDARD port and not
the configured one. A Postgres on any other port is blocked and must be added
to networkPolicy.egress.extraPorts.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 5432
{{- /*
Redis/Valkey, same reasoning as Postgres above: the standard port, because
outline.secrets.redisSecretRef holds a URL this chart does not read.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 6379
{{- /*
Outbound HTTPS. Needed for the OIDC provider: Outline fetches the issuer's
discovery document at boot, and the discovery URL also lives inside a secret.
443 to any destination is as narrow as this object gets for that - a hostname
cannot appear in a NetworkPolicy. An OIDC provider on a non-standard port (a
CI dex on 5556, for instance) needs extraPorts.
*/}}
- ports:
- protocol: TCP
port: 443
{{- with $np.egress }}
{{- with .extraPorts }}
{{- /*
Ports only, to any destination - see the header. This is the operator's
escape hatch from the egress cap, and the only alternative to switching
the whole policy off.
*/}}
- ports:
{{- range . }}
- protocol: TCP
port: {{ int . }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}
{{- end }}