feat(rss-bridge): Gateway-API as an alternative to the Ingress (last chart)
Validate Helm Charts / Detect changed charts (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Validate Helm Charts / Resource quantities (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Validate Helm Charts / Selector match (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Validate Helm Charts / HTTPRoute match (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Validate Helm Charts / Build rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Validate Helm Charts / Trivy config rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Install-test / Install-test rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Validate Helm Charts / Install-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Validate Helm Charts / Detect changed charts (pull_request) Successful in 4s
Validate Helm Charts / Resource quantities (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Validate Helm Charts / Selector match (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Validate Helm Charts / HTTPRoute match (pull_request) Successful in 15s
Validate Helm Charts / Build rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 8s
Validate Helm Charts / Trivy config rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Install-test / Install-test rss-bridge (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
Validate Helm Charts / Install-test (pull_request) Successful in 1m10s
rss-bridge was the twenty-second and last chart of the Gateway-API sweep: 22 charts carried an Ingress template, 21 an HTTPRoute template, and the difference was exactly this one. It had been held back as frozen by #51 - a runner defect, not a property of the chart - and that freeze is lifted. One HTTPRoute carrying ALL THREE hostnames, because nothing differs per host: every name serves the same Service at "/", measured on the live Ingress. spec.hostnames is a list, so one object is the whole answer and a second would repeat one rule. (Unlike homeassistant, whose paths differ per host, or matrix-synapse, whose two routes want different backends.) httpRoute.hostnames is its own MANDATORY value, which is a third shape for this repository and follows from the values rather than from taste. Most charts fall back to ingress.domain; freesailarr and homeassistant reject a hostnames key outright, because a chart-global list could not say which app or host entry it belonged to. This chart has no ingress.domain either, but its names are unambiguous - and the ingress.hosts list it would otherwise reuse carries per-host tlsSecretName values that address nothing once TLS sits on the Gateway's listener. Reusing it would drag a structure whose other half is meaningless into the new mode. rss-bridge.tlsGroups is therefore INERT in Gateway mode, and that is named as a simplification rather than quietly translated: the helper exists only to group hosts by TLS secret name, and there is nothing left to group. The required() on ingress.hosts needed no change to become conditional - it already sits inside the Ingress template behind ingress.enabled - so what is new is that values.yaml and the schema now say so. The ingress.enabled-derived-value screen that caught sure, freesailarr and ytdlp-web-player was run here and came back CLEAN: outside the Ingress template the only readers of an ingress value are NOTES.txt, which knows its own mode, and tlsGroups, called only from behind the switch. The app takes no base URL in its environment, so no "published" helper is needed. First chart of the sweep whose Gateway branch has NO loss to explain, and it was measured rather than assumed (read-only kubectl against the live object): the running Ingress carries the cert-manager annotation plus Helm and Rancher/Fleet bookkeeping, and not one nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io annotation. The group-3 screen came back empty, so NOTES.txt says so positively instead of copying a loss paragraph from another chart. Also corrects the last occurrence in the repository of the outdated sentence "charts in this repo deliberately have no dependencies" (rss-bridge/templates/_helpers.tpl) - dependencies are admissible but expensive since #214, and ytdlp-web-player, stalwart and paperless-ngx use subcharts. The reason the helper is duplicated is unchanged, only its content: sharing it would mean a library chart, a second artefact to publish, version and pull for about one change a year. Minor, not major: additive, defaults unchanged, and relaxing a required is not a tightening. Proven with an EMPTY helm template diff against origin/main for the defaults (229 lines, byte-identical); the Gateway mode with its overlay renders the HTTPRoute in place of the Ingress and nothing else changes. appVersion untouched - 2026-09-30 is the newest date tag the registry has, everything newer is sha-* and latest. ci/run-httproute-match-test.sh goes from 56 assertions over 21 charts to 58 over 22. The overlay at ci/httproute/rss-bridge.yaml has to SUPPLY hostnames, the second in the repository that does (homeassistant's was the first, for a different reason), because this chart has no fallback. NOT PROVEN, and stated in the PR as well: that traffic flows. No Gateway controller runs in CI and no HTTPRoute reaches "Accepted: True" there. For this chart there is additionally NO successful install-test at all - it fails on the Gitea runner in either mode (#51, reproduced on two images while the same chart and image run healthy in the cluster). The chart is deliberately NOT added to ci/excluded-charts.txt: an exclusion would silence the signal, and the day the runner is fixed the test goes green by itself. So the only red contexts expected here are "Install-test / Install-test rss-bridge" and the collective "Validate Helm Charts / Install-test". Fixes #114 Fixes #40
This commit is contained in:
8 files changed
+466
-14
No files matched your search
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Every chart has a wiki page of its own — `https://git.jk-dev.de/jlab-cluster/h
|
||||
| `paperless-ngx` | Paperless-ngx | Largest chart: consume CronJob, SMB-connector PV/PVC, pre/post-consumption scripts ConfigMap. Optional `valkey` subchart — **this repo's own chart, from the published index**, off by default and gated on `valkeySubchart.enabled` (not `valkey.enabled`, which the subchart's strict schema rejects). Configured as a **queue** (PVC + `noeviction`), unlike `stalwart`'s cache: `PAPERLESS_REDIS` is the Celery broker, and `allkeys-lru` evicts across the whole keyspace, where a backlog of waiting consume tasks is exactly what LRU reads as cold. The password comes from the **same 1Password item** as the Redis connection, in a third field `auth-conf` holding the complete line `requirepass <password>` — so the password sits in that item **twice** and a rotation has to touch both fields. Two more traps: with the subchart on, `redis-connection-url` in the vault **must** be repointed at `<release>-valkey-service:6379` or the bundled Valkey runs unused, and `valkeySubchart:` must not be erased — a null override deletes the key, Helm reads an unresolvable `condition:` as *enabled*, so erasing the switch turns the subchart **on** (rejected by `values.schema.json`). Never change `valkey/` and this chart in the same PR, see "Chart dependencies" |
|
||||
| `patchmon` | PatchMon | One Deployment (the 2.x server serves frontend and `/api/*` from one process) plus an optional guacd sidecar; OIDC-only sign-in |
|
||||
| `rallly` | Rallly | Deployment, DB/OIDC/SMTP secrets |
|
||||
| `rss-bridge` | RSS-Bridge | Deployment + whitelist ConfigMap; `ingress.hosts` is a required list of host + optional `tlsSecretName`, so several hosts can keep their own existing certificates (documented deviation from the one-TLS-secret rule, see its `values.yaml`) |
|
||||
| `rss-bridge` | RSS-Bridge | Deployment + whitelist ConfigMap; `ingress.hosts` is a required list of host + optional `tlsSecretName`, so several hosts can keep their own existing certificates (documented deviation from the one-TLS-secret rule, see its `values.yaml`) — required only while `ingress.enabled`, since in Gateway mode the names come from `httpRoute.hostnames` and the secret grouping has nothing to group. **The last chart of the Gateway-API sweep (#114)**, and the only one whose conversion rests on render-level evidence alone: its install-test fails on the Gitea runner in either mode (#51) and it is deliberately **not** excluded, so the test going green is how that will be noticed |
|
||||
| `samba` | Samba | StatefulSet, users secret + config ConfigMap |
|
||||
| `satisfactory` | Satisfactory game server | StatefulSet, no ingress |
|
||||
| `searxng` | SearXNG | Stateless Deployment + settings ConfigMap (`use_default_settings: true` plus a free-form `settings.extra` passthrough); the signing key is a required `OnePasswordItem`, an external Valkey an optional second one. `ingress.domain` is read twice — Ingress host and `SEARXNG_BASE_URL` — so it stays required with the Ingress switched off |
|
||||
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ Three things to know before touching it:
|
||||
- **What is deliberately not checked**, named so the gaps are not mistaken for coverage. *That traffic flows* — no Gateway controller runs in CI and none will, so `Accepted: True` is not obtainable; that claim is simply not made anywhere in this pipeline. *That any redirect is ever served* — the pairing check proves the rendered **object** carries a `RequestRedirect` rule on the bare prefix and nothing more: whether an implementation honours the `statusCode` or declines it and fails the whole route is outside what a render can see. *Mutual exclusion with the Ingress* — each chart aborts its own render when `ingress.enabled` and `httpRoute.enabled` are both true, which is where it belongs: this test renders one configuration per chart, and a rule here would have to assume the switch is chart-global, which may not survive the multi-app charts of the sweep. *Cross-namespace and non-Service backends*, and a rule with no `backendRefs` at all (legal for a filter-only rule) — all three are **reported as "not checked", never counted as passing**. The redirect rule the pairing check demands is itself backend-less, so a chart that satisfies that check also earns one "not checked" line; both verdicts are correct at once.
|
||||
- **Two anti-vacuum guards**, because the convention ships `httpRoute.enabled: false` and this test would otherwise be green over nothing. `ci/httproute/<chart>.yaml` is a render-only overlay applied **last** whose one job is to put a chart into Gateway mode — and a chart that *has* one and still renders no route **fails**. On top of that the run fails if **no assertion at all** held anywhere. `cyberchef` is exercised through its ordinary install-test fixture (which installs in Gateway mode, see below), every other converted chart through its overlay. For a multi-app chart the overlay also has to enter every shape the template has: `ci/httproute/freesailarr.yaml` moves one app onto a host of its own so that the shared-host route *and* the per-app route are both rendered.
|
||||
|
||||
Measured in CI (run 719, the pilot): **30 charts, 4 assertions held**, whole job 13 s including checkout and the Helm setup, no cluster. Group 1 took that to 20 assertions over 10 charts and group 2 to 36 over 15; the prefix/redirect pairing of Gitea #118 adds the first check since the pilot rather than a chart, which brought it to 37 over 15 — one assertion for `freesailarr`'s `/qbittorrent`, plus one more "not checked" line for the backend-less redirect rule it demands. **Group 3 takes it to `56` assertions over `21` charts**, which is the sweep finished except for the frozen `rss-bridge`. Group 3's 19 come from six charts and three of them contribute more than one route: `keycloak` 4 (public and admin routes), `matrix-synapse` 4 (homeserver and delegation routes), `homeassistant` 5 (two routes, three rules — its overlay is the only one in the repo that has to *supply* hostnames, since the chart has no `ingress.domain`), `bulwark` 2, `stalwart` 2, `ytdlp-web-player` 2. The fail path was exercised rather than assumed: a Service renamed in the route, a port the Service does not expose, a port left out entirely, an emptied `parentRefs` with the chart's own guard disabled, an overlay that renders no route, a run with zero assertions, and — for the pairing — both the redirect rule deleted outright and the redirect pointed at a path other than the one stripped; each produced a `FAIL` naming both sides and a non-zero exit.
|
||||
Measured in CI (run 719, the pilot): **30 charts, 4 assertions held**, whole job 13 s including checkout and the Helm setup, no cluster. Group 1 took that to 20 assertions over 10 charts and group 2 to 36 over 15; the prefix/redirect pairing of Gitea #118 adds the first check since the pilot rather than a chart, which brought it to 37 over 15 — one assertion for `freesailarr`'s `/qbittorrent`, plus one more "not checked" line for the backend-less redirect rule it demands. Group 3 took it to `56` assertions over `21` charts, from six charts of which three contribute more than one route: `keycloak` 4 (public and admin routes), `matrix-synapse` 4 (homeserver and delegation routes), `homeassistant` 5 (two routes, three rules — its overlay was the first in the repo that has to *supply* hostnames, since the chart has no `ingress.domain`), `bulwark` 2, `stalwart` 2, `ytdlp-web-player` 2. **`rss-bridge` finishes the sweep at `58` assertions over `22` charts**: one route, so two assertions, and its overlay is the **second** that has to supply hostnames — for a different reason than `homeassistant`'s, which is worth keeping apart. `homeassistant` has no `httpRoute.hostnames` key at all and its overlay supplies the names through `ingress.hosts`; `rss-bridge` *has* the key and its overlay fills it, because this chart has no `ingress.domain` to fall back to either but its hostnames are unambiguous (one Service, one path). For this one chart the render assurances are the **only** automated coverage the Gateway mode has, because its install-test does not pass at all — Gitea #51, a runner defect, and the chart is deliberately not excluded so the day it is fixed the test goes green by itself. The fail path was exercised rather than assumed: a Service renamed in the route, a port the Service does not expose, a port left out entirely, an emptied `parentRefs` with the chart's own guard disabled, an overlay that renders no route, a run with zero assertions, and — for the pairing — both the redirect rule deleted outright and the redirect pointed at a path other than the one stripped; each produced a `FAIL` naming both sides and a non-zero exit.
|
||||
|
||||
### Install-test (PR pipeline stage 2)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ These guidelines are **binding for every current and future chart** in this repo
|
||||
- **A value, not auto-detection.** `.Capabilities.APIVersions` is unreliable at template time, and an `HTTPRoute` without the Gateway-API CRDs fails at install time — so a chart that guessed would sometimes render an object the cluster rejects and sometimes silently render nothing.
|
||||
- **Mutually exclusive with `ingress.enabled`**, enforced by a `fail` that names **both** value paths. Two paths onto the same Service under one hostname is a conflict at DNS level already; a migration runs over a **second hostname** (`httpRoute.hostnames` set explicitly while the Ingress keeps `ingress.domain`), never over parallel operation.
|
||||
- **`parentRefs` is mandatory in Gateway mode**, enforced by a `fail` on the empty list. A route without a parent attaches to nothing and is simply inert — created, schema-valid, rejected by nobody, reported by nothing.
|
||||
- **One source of truth for the hostname.** Empty `hostnames` means `[ingress.domain]`; two values that have to agree drift apart. `ingress.domain` is therefore read in Gateway mode too — it names the release's public hostname and is not an Ingress switch.
|
||||
- **One source of truth for the hostname.** Empty `hostnames` means `[ingress.domain]`; two values that have to agree drift apart. `ingress.domain` is therefore read in Gateway mode too — it names the release's public hostname and is not an Ingress switch. After the sweep there are **three** shapes here, and which one a chart gets follows from its values rather than from taste: a chart with an `ingress.domain` falls back to it (the default, most charts); a chart with no `ingress.domain` whose names could not be attributed — `freesailarr` to one of ten apps, `homeassistant` to one host entry and therefore one set of paths — has **no `hostnames` key at all** and reads the names where they already live; and `rss-bridge` has the key as a **mandatory** value with no fallback, because it has no `ingress.domain` either but its names *are* unambiguous (one Service at `/`), while the `ingress.hosts` list it would otherwise reuse carries per-host `tlsSecretName` values that address nothing once TLS sits on the listener. The rule behind all three: a hostname list is admissible exactly where it can say what it belongs to, and reusing an Ingress structure whose other half is meaningless in this mode is not a saving.
|
||||
- **`NOTES.txt` says which mode is active**, as `keycloak` already does for its cases, and names what the mode costs.
|
||||
- **What has no counterpart, and must be said rather than rebuilt.** The Gateway API has no annotation channel for controller behaviour. `rewrite-target` has a real equivalent (the `URLRewrite` filter in a rule); **`proxy-body-size` has none** — an upload limit is implementation-specific policy, so a chart that depends on one must print in its Gateway-mode `NOTES.txt` that the limit is **not enforced** and has to be set at the Gateway. Charts that *set or recommend* one carry that disclosure: `calibre-web-automated`, `outline`, `paperless-ngx`, `zipline` since group 2, `bulwark` and `matrix-synapse` since group 3. `garage` *depends* on one without setting it: its `ingress.annotations` comment tells the operator to set `proxy-body-size: "0"` because ingress-nginx's 1 MB default truncates S3 uploads. Measured while sweeping group 1 — "sets no behaviour-bearing annotation" is not the same question as "needs none", and the sweep screens on the second one. `freesailarr` is the mirror image of `garage` and was measured in group 2: it sets no body-size annotation and needs none itself, but `ingress.annotations` is the only lever an operator has for one (qBittorrent takes torrent-file uploads), so its Gateway-mode `NOTES.txt` says that an annotation set there is gone. The same applies to auth annotations in front of an app with no login of its own: in Gateway mode that escape hatch does not exist in the chart at all (`cyberchef`, `searxng`), and so does any annotation a chart documents as its only lever for a response header (`bentopdf`: `X-Robots-Tag`).
|
||||
- **Screen the LIVE object, not only the chart — group 3's lesson, and the generalisation of Gitea #118.** A chart can read as correct while the running system fills a gap of the chart with an annotation the **operator** set, and the Gateway mode drops `ingress.annotations`, so it drops the compensation with it. At #118 that was found *after* shipping, on `freesailarr`, where the annotation was a redirect nobody would have looked for in the chart. Group 3 measured it beforehand with read-only `kubectl` against the live cluster, and **four of its six charts carried such an annotation that the chart never sets**: `keycloak` (`proxy-buffer-size: 16k` and `proxy-buffers-number: 4`, on *both* of its Ingress objects), `matrix-synapse` (`proxy-body-size: 50m`, plus the `nginx.org/client-max-body-size` twin for the other nginx controller, plus a `configuration-snippet`), `stalwart` (the whole `enable-cors` block), `bulwark` (`proxy-body-size: 25m`). None of them appears in a `git grep` of this repository, because no template sets any of them — the only hits are the *documentation* that recommends two of them. **The measurement at the live object is part of the procedure, not a flourish**, and reading the chart alone is not a substitute for it.
|
||||
@@ -416,11 +416,11 @@ These guidelines are **binding for every current and future chart** in this repo
|
||||
- `freesailarr` (group 2), whose `freesailarr.sharedIngressApps` was gated on `ingress.enabled` and is read by the `<APP>__SERVER__URLBASE` environment variables as well as by the routing objects. In Gateway mode that list would have come out **empty**, so Radarr, Sonarr and Prowlarr would have been told no base path while their routes served them under `/radarr`, `/sonarr`, `/prowlarr` — a UI whose assets and API calls are linked at the host root, behind a Ready pod. The two guards living in that helper (seerr/mediathekarr only at `/`, no duplicate paths on the shared host) would have gone unenforced in that mode for the same reason. Helper `freesailarr.published`.
|
||||
- `ytdlp-web-player` (group 3), the one this file had listed as still open, and the find with the sharpest consequence. Its `ytdlp-web-player.validate` guard — which refuses to publish the application and the bundled oauth2-proxy on the **same host** — was gated on `ingress.enabled`, so in Gateway mode it went silent. **And that guard is needed more in Gateway mode, not less.** In Ingress mode ignoring it fails loudly: ingress-nginx's admission webhook rejects the second Ingress and the Fleet bundle lands in `ErrApplied`. In Gateway mode **the webhook never fires** — it compares Ingress objects with Ingress objects, and an `HTTPRoute` is a different kind — so nothing rejects anything, both objects stay valid, and one hostname is served over two data paths that are *not* equivalent: the proxy's Ingress goes through **authentication**, the chart's `HTTPRoute` goes straight to the application. Which one a client reaches depends on what DNS resolves to, so it is an authentication bypass that comes and goes with a record, reported by nothing. Helper `ytdlp-web-player.published`, and the Gateway-mode abort carries its own message saying exactly that.
|
||||
|
||||
All three are now closed, and the screen was run over all six charts of group 3 rather than only the suspected one.
|
||||
All three are now closed, and the screen was run over all six charts of group 3 rather than only the suspected one — and over `rss-bridge` as the last chart, where it came back **clean**: outside its Ingress template the only readers of an ingress value are `NOTES.txt`, which knows its own mode, and the `rss-bridge.tlsGroups` helper, which is called only from behind `ingress.enabled`. The application takes no base URL and no hostname in its environment, so there is nothing to compute from the switch and no `published` helper is needed. **A clean result is worth recording too**: the screen's value is that it is run, not that it always finds something, and "this chart needed no helper" is a measurement rather than an omission.
|
||||
- **A subchart does not come along, and that has to be said where somebody will look for it.** `ytdlp-web-player`'s oauth2-proxy dependency has **no Gateway-API support** and this repo does not patch upstream charts (see "Chart dependencies"), so it renders an Ingress or nothing. In the *recommended* configuration — the proxy in the data path, owning the host, the chart's own routing object off — the object that publishes the release is therefore **the subchart's Ingress in both of the chart's modes**, and setting `httpRoute.enabled` there changes nothing about how the host is served. The chart's own route is for the proxy-disabled case or for the application on a host of its own, which is the documented unauthenticated bypass. Stated in the template header, in `values.yaml`, in the schema and in the proxy branch of `NOTES.txt`, because an operator migrating hosts would otherwise set the value and wonder why nothing moved.
|
||||
- **CI**: either the chart's install-test fixture installs in Gateway mode, or it gets a render-only overlay at `ci/httproute/<chart>.yaml` — otherwise `ci/run-httproute-match-test.sh` is green over nothing for it, which that test fails on. An overlay for a multi-app chart has a second job: it must enter **every** shape the template has, or the branch nobody exercised is the one that breaks. `ci/httproute/freesailarr.yaml` gives one app a host of its own so both the shared-host route and the per-app route render.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference implementation: `template-chart/templates/xxx.httproute.yaml`. Pilot: `cyberchef`. Group 1 — the charts rendering one Ingress with no behaviour-bearing annotation — followed: `bentopdf`, `garage`, `patchmon`, `rallly`, `searxng`, `sure`, `urlaubsverwaltung`, `voucher-vault`. Group 2 — the charts whose behaviour hangs off an nginx annotation — followed: `calibre-web-automated`, `outline`, `paperless-ngx`, `zipline` (all four `proxy-body-size`) and `freesailarr` (`rewrite-target`). **Group 3 — the special shapes — finishes the sweep**: `homeassistant`, `keycloak`, `bulwark`, `matrix-synapse`, `stalwart`, `ytdlp-web-player`. That leaves exactly one chart, `rss-bridge`, which is frozen for changes (#51) and is why **#114 cannot be closed while #51 is open**.
|
||||
Reference implementation: `template-chart/templates/xxx.httproute.yaml`. Pilot: `cyberchef`. Group 1 — the charts rendering one Ingress with no behaviour-bearing annotation — followed: `bentopdf`, `garage`, `patchmon`, `rallly`, `searxng`, `sure`, `urlaubsverwaltung`, `voucher-vault`. Group 2 — the charts whose behaviour hangs off an nginx annotation — followed: `calibre-web-automated`, `outline`, `paperless-ngx`, `zipline` (all four `proxy-body-size`) and `freesailarr` (`rewrite-target`). Group 3 — the special shapes: `homeassistant`, `keycloak`, `bulwark`, `matrix-synapse`, `stalwart`, `ytdlp-web-player`. **`rss-bridge` finishes the sweep**, as the twenty-second and last chart: 22 charts carried an Ingress template and 21 an HTTPRoute template, and the difference was exactly this one. It had been held back as frozen for changes by #51 — a runner defect, not a property of the chart — and the earlier claim that **#114 could not be closed while #51 was open no longer holds**: the maintainer lifted that freeze, so #114 closes with the chart converted while **#51 stays open**, since the runner defect is worked around for this purpose rather than fixed. Its shape: one `HTTPRoute` carrying **all three** of its hostnames, because nothing differs per host (every name serves the same Service at `/`, measured on the live Ingress), so `spec.hostnames` as a list is the whole answer and a second object would repeat one rule. It is also the only chart of the sweep whose Gateway branch has **no loss to document** — its live Ingress carries no `nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io` annotation at all, so the group-3 screen came back empty — and the only one whose conversion rests on **render-level evidence alone**, since its install-test fails on the runner in either mode.
|
||||
|
||||
**Three of #114's descriptions of the group-3 shapes did not survive contact with the charts**, and the corrected list is worth having here because it is the one somebody will copy from:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user